Assessing In-service Teachers’ Chemistry Content Knowledge and Self-efficacy in Teaching the K to 12 Science Curriculum

  • Yna Camille A. Mongcal MS Science Education Program, School of Science and Engineering, Loyola Schools, Ateneo de Manila University, Katipunan Ave., Loyola Heights, Quezon City 1108
  • Queena N. Lee-Chua Department of Mathematics, School of Science and Engineering, Loyola Schools, Ateneo de Manila University, Katipunan Ave., Loyola Heights, Quezon City 1108
  • Armando, Jr. M. Guidote Department of Chemistry, School of Science and Engineering, Loyola Schools, Ateneo de Manila University, Katipunan Ave., Loyola Heights, Quezon City 1108

Abstract

As the K to 12 Science program was formally implemented, interventions to enhance competence and confidence of teachers in teaching science in a spiral progression approach are main concerns. This study aims to assess the chemistry content knowledge and self-efficacy of 38 in-service teachers enrolled in a graduate program from a teacher education institution using a content knowledge test (CKT) and a self-efficacy beliefs scale (SeS) using a mixed-method approach. Quantitative findings reveal that the least mastered topics in chemistry of the teacher-respondents include solutions, chemical bonding, the mole concept, gas laws, and chemical reactions. The science teachers say they are “somewhat confident” in teaching the chemistry topics. Qualitative findings include difficulties in answering the CKT and challenges encountered in teaching chemistry using the K to 12 science curriculum. In the needs analysis, key findings in the results of focus group discussion are used to verify quantitative findings. The correlation between content knowledge and self-efficacy beliefs is r = -0.12, with findings showing a negligible to low correlation. This implies that even if teachers perceive that they are “somewhat confident” in teaching chemistry topics, such beliefs do not match their content knowledge scores. Valid findings are based on the CKT results and further suggest that the CKT (not the SeS) is a good measure in determining the content learning needs of teachers.

References

Adams J. Taking Charge of Curriculum: Teacher Networks and Curriculum Implementation. New York: Teachers College Press; 2000.
Arzi H, White R. Change in teachers’ knowledge of subject matter: A 17-year longitudinal study. Science Education. 2007; 92(2):221–251.
Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory; 1986. Cited by Elliott SN, Kratochwill TR, Cook JL. Educational Psychology 3rd Edition. Boston: McGraw Hill; 2000.
Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1997.
Bandura A. Self-efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents “Guide for Constructing Self-efficacy Scales”. Information Age Publishing; 2005.
Bray-Clark N, Bates R. Self-efficacy Beliefs and Teacher Effectiveness: Implications for Professional Development. The Professional Educator. 2003; 26(1):13-22.
Carroll SR, Carroll D. Statistics made Simple for School Leaders: Data-driven Decision Making. Lanham, Md: Scarecrow Press; 2003.
Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research Methods in Education 6th Edition. London: Routledge; 2008.
Coll R, Taylor N. Alternative conceptions of chemical bonding held by upper secondary and tertiary students. Research in Science & Technological Education. 2001; 19(2):171–191.
Department of Education. K to 12 Curriculum Guide: Science. Available from: http://deped.gov.ph/k-to-12/curriculum-guides/Grade-1-10 [Accessed 28th Oct 2016].
Elliott SN, Kratochwill TR, Cook JL. Educational Psychology 3rd Edition. Boston: McGraw Hill; 2000.
Fraenkel J, Wallen N. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education 5th Edition. Boston: McGraw-Hill; 2003.
Gess-Newsome J, Lederman NG. Biology teachers’ perceptions of subject matter structure and its relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 1995; 32:301–325.
Hashweh MZ. Effect of subject-matter knowledge in the teaching of biology and physics. Teaching and Teacher Education. 1987; 3(2):109–120.
Karam R. Implementing Education Reforms to Enhance School Performance. California: rand.org. Available from: http://www.rand.org/blog/2015/11/implementing-education-reforms-to-enhance-school-performance.html [Accessed 28th Oct 2016].
Kind V. A Degree is Not Enough: A Quantitative Study of Aspects of Pre-service Science Teachers’ Chemistry Content Knowledge. Int J Sci Educ. 2014; 36(8):1313-1345.
Lin H, Cheng H, Lawrenz F. The assessment of students’ and teachers’ understanding of gas laws. J Chem Educ. 2000; 77:235–238.
Lucille LKW. Understanding the particulate nature of matter on water: Pre-service elementary school science teachers’ views. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in S.E. Asia. 2000; 23(2):58–72.
McConnell T, Parker J, Eberhardt J. Assessing Teachers’ Science Content Knowledge: A Strategy for Assessing Depth of Understanding. J Sci Teacher Educ. 2013; 24:717-743.
Nunnally J, Bernstein I. Psychometric Theory 3rd Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
Official Gazette. Republic Act No. 10533: Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013. Available from: http://www.gov.ph/2013/05/15/republic-act-no-10533/ [Accessed 28th Oct 2016].
Sanders LR, Borko H, Lockard JD. Secondary science teachers’ knowledge base when teaching science courses in and out of their area of certification. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 1993; 30(7):723–736.
Santau A, Rivera J, Bovis S, Orend J. A Mile Wide or an Inch Deep? Improving Elementary Pre-service Teachers’ Science Content Knowledge within the Context of a Science Method Course. J Sci Teacher Educ. 2014; 25:953-976.
SEI-DOST & UP NISMED. Framework for Philippines Science Teacher Education. Manila: SEI-DOST & UP NISMED; 2011.
SEI-DOST & UP NISMED. Science Framework for Philippine Basic Education. Manila: SEI-DOST & UP NISMED; 2011.
Shulman L. Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review. 1987; 57(1):1-22.
TIMSS and PIRLS. Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (2003) Released Science Items. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA); 2005.
TIMSS and PIRLS. Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (2011) Released Science Items. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA); 2013.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Education for All Global Monitoring Report: The Quality Imperative. Paris: UNESCO Publishing; 2004.
Velasco A. Facing the Challenges of K to 12 Education. Bataan: Department of Education Bataan Publications. Available from: http://www.depedbataan.com/resources/4/facing_the_challenges_of_k_to_12_education.pdf [Accessed 28th Oct 2016].
Published
2017-12-19
How to Cite
Mongcal, Y. C. A., Lee-Chua, Q. N., & Guidote, A. J. M. (2017). Assessing In-service Teachers’ Chemistry Content Knowledge and Self-efficacy in Teaching the K to 12 Science Curriculum. KIMIKA, 28(2), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.26534/kimika.v28i2.13-21
Section
Chemistry Education