Trace metal analysis of geothermal waters
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26534/kimika.v12i1.37-44Keywords:
geothermal waters, arsenic, mercury, gold, anodic stripping voltammetryAbstract
The determination of trace amounts of arsenic, mercury, and gold in geothermal water samples by differential pulse anodic stripping voltammetry (DPASV) was investigated. Optimum parameters affecting voltammetric behavior, such as deposition potential, supporting electrolyte, and nature of working electrode were first determined. A thin film gold electrode (TFGE) was used for the analysis of As(III) in 6 M HCl, and Hg(II) in 0.1 M HNO3. The analysis of Au(III) was carried out in 0.2 M HCl using a glassy carbon electrode (GCE). The deposition potentials employed for each metal were -0.150 V, 0.000 V, and -0.500 V for As, Hg, and Au, respectively.
The stripping peaks observed at -0.05 V. +0.50 V and +0.70 V (vs. SCE) for As(III), Hg(II) and Au(III), respectively, were utilized for their quantitative determination. The detection limit for each metal were 0.2 ppb for As(III), 0.02 ppb for Hg(II) and 0.04 ppb for Au(III). Different sample pretreatment procedures were devised for each metal. The concentration ranges obtained by DPASV were 6.6- 10.1 ppm As(III), 0.02- 0.07 ppm Hg(II) and 0.2- 8.4 ppb Au(III) in some geothermal water samples analyzed.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).